🔗 Share this article

US legal authorities have stated that a Libyan man voluntarily confessed to participating in operations against American targets, comprising the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 incident and an failed attempt to assassinate a US politician using a booby-trapped garment.

Statement Particulars

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is reported to have acknowledged his participation in the killing of 270 individuals when Flight 103 was destroyed over the Scotland's area of Lockerbie, during questioning in a Libyan prison in the year 2012.

Referred to as the defendant, the elderly man has asserted that several hooded individuals forced him to deliver the statement after intimidating him and his loved ones.

His attorneys are attempting to prevent it from being employed as testimony in his trial in Washington in the coming year.

Courtroom Battle

In answer, legal counsel from the US Department of Justice have said they can establish in the courtroom that the admission was "willing, trustworthy and correct."

The availability of the defendant's claimed admission was first made public in 2020, when the United States announced it was indicting him with creating and priming the IED utilized on Flight 103.

Defense Claims

The defendant is accused of being a former official in Libyan intelligence agency and has been in American custody since recent years.

He has stated innocent to the accusations and is due to stand trial at the District Court for the the capital in spring.

Mas'ud's lawyers are working to block the trial from hearing about the admission and have filed a request asking for it to be withheld.

They contend it was acquired under duress following the uprising which toppled the Libyan leader in 2011.

Alleged Pressure

They say former officials of the leader's government were being singled out with unlawful murders, seizures and torture when the suspect was seized from his home by armed individuals the following time.

He was transported to an informal prison facility where fellow prisoners were reportedly beaten and abused and was alone in a cramped space when several hooded individuals handed him a solitary sheet of material.

His attorneys said its handwritten information started with an command that he was to acknowledge to the Lockerbie bombing and a separate terror attack.

Substantial Extremist Events

The suspect states he was instructed to remember what it said about the incidents and restate it when he was interviewed by someone else the next day.

Fearing for his safety and that of his family, he claimed he thought he had no choice but to comply.

In their response to the legal team's petition, attorneys from the American justice department have declared the court was being requested to exclude "highly significant evidence" of the suspect's culpability in "several substantial terror events against US citizens."

Authorities Counterarguments

They claim the suspect's version of events is unconvincing and untrue, and argue that the information of the statement can be verified by trustworthy external proof collected over many years.

The government attorneys claim the defendant and fellow ex- officials of the former leader's intelligence service were kept in a hidden detention facility run by a militia when they were questioned by an seasoned Libyan investigator.

They assert that in the turmoil of the post-uprising period, the center was "the protected place" for the defendant and the fellow agents, accounting for the violence and opposition attitude prevailing at the time.

Interrogation Information

Based to the police officer who interrogated the suspect, the location was "properly managed", the detainees were not restrained and there were no indications of coercion or intimidation.

The investigator has said that over two days, a self-assured and well suspect explained his role in the attacks of Flight 103.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also asserted he had confessed constructing a explosive which went off in a West Berlin nightclub in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of several people, encompassing multiple American soldiers, and harming many others.

Other Claims

He is also said to have described his participation in an conspiracy on the life of an anonymous American Secretary of State at a public event in the Asian country.

The defendant is alleged to have described that a person travelling the American official was carrying a rigged overcoat.

It was Mas'ud's assignment to activate the explosive but he opted not to do so after discovering that the individual wearing the item did not know he was on a deadly operation.

He opted "not to activate the trigger" although his superior in the secret service being present at the period and inquiring what was {going on|happening|occurring